Isac Stroemberg vs Fredrik Krogh Solheim Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

Published on 19 Aug at 03:23 AM UTC

HEAD TO HEAD

I. Stroemberg vs F. Krogh Solheim

Isac Stroemberg
Isac Stroemberg

Flag SWE SWE

w
w
w
l
w
w
w
w
l
l
Fredrik Krogh Solheim
Fredrik Krogh Solheim

Flag NOR NOR

w
w
l
w
w
w
l
w
w
l

1

Win

1

Played

0

Win

22
Age
19
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
0
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Head-to-head: Stroemberg 1 - 0 Solheim

They have played 2 sets in total, with Isac Stroemberg winning 2 and Fredrik Krogh Solheim winning 0. The last match between Isac Stroemberg and Fredrik Krogh Solheim was at the M15 Bastad, 19-08-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Isac Stroemberg getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-0.

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Stroemberg1
Solheim0
Last 1 H2H Matches:

(Q3M15 Bastad(08-19-25)

Clay
SWE Flag
Isac Stroemberg
7
6
NOR Flag
Fredrik Krogh Solheim
6
0

I. Stroemberg vs F. K. Solheim H2H Profile

Stats
$0Career Prize Money$0
44.00% (11-14)Career Total W/L56.52% (39-30)
1Clay0
1Total H2H Matches0
0% (0-0)YTD Win/Loss0% (0-0)

I. Stroemberg vs F. K. Solheim Match Preview:

  • Second Serve Performance: Stroemberg slightly edges Solheim with a win rate of 39.01% compared to Solheim's 38.59% in recent second serve points. What does this suggest for the match outcome? A small advantage for Stroemberg in second serve scenarios.
  • Return Game Statistics: Stroemberg shows a strong return game, winning 52.76% of their opponent's second serve points, while Solheim wins 38.82%. On first serve returns, Stroemberg leads with 35.12% compared to Solheim's 22.38%. Could this be a decisive factor? It suggests Stroemberg's strength in return games might give them an upper hand.
  • Under Pressure Analysis: Solheim excels under pressure, saving 47.54% of breakpoints compared to Stroemberg's 35.48%. Does this mean Solheim is better at clutch moments? It indicates Solheim's resilience during critical points.
  • Performance Overview: Stroemberg has a broader win rate of 62.5% over the past year, while Solheim's win rate is 50%. What does this say about consistency? Stroemberg appears more consistent in securing victories.
  • Best Surface: Stroemberg's best is the indoor hard surface (40%), whereas Solheim thrives on clay (56%). Could the playing surface influence the match? Yes, surface preference might affect their performance.
  • Player Level: Both players compete often in ITF tournaments; Stroemberg holds a higher win percentage (62.5% versus Solheim's 50%). What level of competition favors Stroemberg? Lower-tier events have seen Stroemberg succeed more frequently.
  • Opponent Quality: Solheim has faced stronger opponents on average (rank 168.27) compared to Stroemberg (rank 183.5), suggesting possible experience against tougher competition.
  • Deciding Set Performance: Both players have a 50% win rate in deciding sets, indicating neither has a clear advantage if the match extends to a deciding set.
  • Break Point Conversion: Solheim leads slightly with a 38.1% break point conversion rate, whereas Stroemberg converts 34.69% of attempts. How might this affect match dynamics? Solheim might capitalize more effectively on break opportunities.

Editorial Prediction (August 19, 2025, UTC):

This upcoming tennis match between Stroemberg and Solheim promises to be competitive, given the nuanced advantages each player holds. Stroemberg’s superior statistics in second serve points and return games suggest a potential upper hand in regular-play scenarios, hinting at an ability to apply consistent pressure on Solheim's service games. However, Solheim’s composure under pressure, notably in saving break points, indicates a tenacious resilience during critical moments, which could neutralize Stroemberg's strengths.

While Solheim has faced tougher opponents on average, lending themselves to possibly higher adaptability, Stroemberg has shown a stronger overall match-winning record over the past year. This places Stroemberg in a favorable light for consistency. Surface preferences might also influence the match dynamics, but without definitive insight into the current event surface, predicting dominance in this aspect remains speculative.

Considering these factors, despite Solheim’s slight edge in break point conversion and breakpoint saves, Stroemberg’s consistency in match wins and superior return game statistics position them as the more likely victor in this encounter. Thus, Stroemberg is favored to win based on current statistical indicators.

Isac Stroemberg vs Fredrik Krogh Solheim Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

I. Stroemberg vs F. K. Solheim H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Stats
1H2H Matches Won0
2Sets Won0
13Games Won6
1Aces (Total)3
5Total Double Faults2
1:36:8Average Match Time1:36:8
63% (50/80)1st Serve %63% (37/59)
64% (32/50)1st Serve Win %59% (22/37)
50% (15/30)2nd Serve Win %32% (7/22)
56% (5/9)Break Pts Won %18% (2/11)
51% (30/59)Return Points Win %41% (33/80)
100% (1/1)Best‑of‑3 Win %0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)1st Set Won, Won Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)1st Set Won, Lost Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)1st Set Lost, Won Match0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: Stroemberg 45%, Solheim 45%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Stroemberg 60%, Solheim 47%.
Break Points Saved %: Stroemberg 58%, Solheim 53%.

I. Stroemberg Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
HardM25 Norman - 20-10-2025

Q1

USAK. Arora
L
6-3 5-7 10-8
ClayM15 Bastad - 18-08-2025

QF

FRAA. Garcian
L
4-6 6-1 6-3

R2

NORA. Petrovic
W
5-7 6-2 6-3

R1

NORL. Rivera
W
6-7(9) 6-3 6-2

Q3

NORF. Krogh
W
7-6(4) 6-0

F. K. Solheim Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
HardM15 Monastir - 17-11-2025

Q1

GERD. Eichenseher
L
w/o
HardM25 Monastir - 03-11-2025

R1

FRAR. Bertrand
L
6-2 6-2

Q3

GBRY. Jenkins
W
6-3 6-1

Q2

INDN. Eric
W
6-3 6-0
HardM15 Monastir - 27-10-2025

R1

MARA. Jamji
L
6-1 1-6 6-3
banner

I. Stroemberg vs F. K. Solheim Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
44.00% (11/14)YTD Win/Loss56.52% (39/30)
45.00% (27/33)Sets Win/Loss55.41% (87/70)
47.47% (272/301)Games Win/Loss53.02% (826/732)
0.00% (0/1)Hard Win/Loss56.25% (18/14)
47.37% (9/10)Clay Win/Loss56.76% (21/16)
40.00% (2/3)Indoor Hard W/L0% (0/0)
0.07Aces Per Game0.1
19Aces Total74
0.38Double Faults Per Game0.05
106Total Double Faults40
1:21:50Average Match Time1st Match
225.16Average Opponent Rank152.46
63% (847/1341)1st Serve %63% (851/1348)
60% (511/847)1st Serve Win %68% (582/851)
41% (205/494)2nd Serve Win %46% (227/497)
55% (75/137)Break Points Won % (Total)37% (48/131)
45% (624/1383)Return Points Win %37% (505/1356)
44.00% (11/14)Futures W/L56.52% (39/30)
44% (11/25)Best of 3 Sets Win %57% (39/69)
60% (3/5)Tiebreaks Win % (Total)50% (6/12)
50% (5/10)Deciding Set Win %53% (10/19)
73% (11/8)1st Set Won, Won Match89% (37/33)
27% (11/3)1st Set Won, Lost Match11% (37/4)
21% (14/3)1st Set Lost, Won Match19% (32/6)

Other Tennis Predictions Today

02:05 AM 17/11/25
Prediction
JAMB. Bicknell
JPNS. Hazawa
W1
1.166
W2
4.35
12:30 PM 17/11/25
Prediction
ITAG. Cadenasso
ESPC. L. Montagud
W1
1.41
W2
2.64
07:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction
JPNY. Shimizu6
JPNY. Takahashi
W1
1.61
W2
2.15
12:00 PM 17/11/25
Prediction
UKRY. Dzhavakian
RUSE. Philippov
W1
1.72
W2
1.98
02:00 PM 17/11/25
Prediction
ESPM. A. Gurri
ITAG. L. Vela
W1
1.56
W2
2.24
07:00 PM 17/11/25
Prediction
ESPN. Sanchez-Izquierdo
ITAF. Agamenone
W1
1.98
W2
1.72