Isac Stroemberg vs Fredrik Krogh Solheim Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 19 Aug at 03:23 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
I. Stroemberg vs F. Krogh Solheim

SWE
1
Win
Played
0
Win

NOR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Stroemberg 1 - 0 Solheim
They have played 2 sets in total, with Isac Stroemberg winning 2 and Fredrik Krogh Solheim winning 0. The last match between Isac Stroemberg and Fredrik Krogh Solheim was at the M15 Bastad, 19-08-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Isac Stroemberg getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Stroemberg | 1 |
| Solheim | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) M15 Bastad(08-19-25)
I. Stroemberg vs F. K. Solheim H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 44.00% (11-14) | Career Total W/L | 56.52% (39-30) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
I. Stroemberg vs F. K. Solheim Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Stroemberg slightly edges Solheim with a win rate of 39.01% compared to Solheim's 38.59% in recent second serve points. What does this suggest for the match outcome? A small advantage for Stroemberg in second serve scenarios.
- Return Game Statistics: Stroemberg shows a strong return game, winning 52.76% of their opponent's second serve points, while Solheim wins 38.82%. On first serve returns, Stroemberg leads with 35.12% compared to Solheim's 22.38%. Could this be a decisive factor? It suggests Stroemberg's strength in return games might give them an upper hand.
- Under Pressure Analysis: Solheim excels under pressure, saving 47.54% of breakpoints compared to Stroemberg's 35.48%. Does this mean Solheim is better at clutch moments? It indicates Solheim's resilience during critical points.
- Performance Overview: Stroemberg has a broader win rate of 62.5% over the past year, while Solheim's win rate is 50%. What does this say about consistency? Stroemberg appears more consistent in securing victories.
- Best Surface: Stroemberg's best is the indoor hard surface (40%), whereas Solheim thrives on clay (56%). Could the playing surface influence the match? Yes, surface preference might affect their performance.
- Player Level: Both players compete often in ITF tournaments; Stroemberg holds a higher win percentage (62.5% versus Solheim's 50%). What level of competition favors Stroemberg? Lower-tier events have seen Stroemberg succeed more frequently.
- Opponent Quality: Solheim has faced stronger opponents on average (rank 168.27) compared to Stroemberg (rank 183.5), suggesting possible experience against tougher competition.
- Deciding Set Performance: Both players have a 50% win rate in deciding sets, indicating neither has a clear advantage if the match extends to a deciding set.
- Break Point Conversion: Solheim leads slightly with a 38.1% break point conversion rate, whereas Stroemberg converts 34.69% of attempts. How might this affect match dynamics? Solheim might capitalize more effectively on break opportunities.
Editorial Prediction (August 19, 2025, UTC):
This upcoming tennis match between Stroemberg and Solheim promises to be competitive, given the nuanced advantages each player holds. Stroemberg’s superior statistics in second serve points and return games suggest a potential upper hand in regular-play scenarios, hinting at an ability to apply consistent pressure on Solheim's service games. However, Solheim’s composure under pressure, notably in saving break points, indicates a tenacious resilience during critical moments, which could neutralize Stroemberg's strengths.
While Solheim has faced tougher opponents on average, lending themselves to possibly higher adaptability, Stroemberg has shown a stronger overall match-winning record over the past year. This places Stroemberg in a favorable light for consistency. Surface preferences might also influence the match dynamics, but without definitive insight into the current event surface, predicting dominance in this aspect remains speculative.
Considering these factors, despite Solheim’s slight edge in break point conversion and breakpoint saves, Stroemberg’s consistency in match wins and superior return game statistics position them as the more likely victor in this encounter. Thus, Stroemberg is favored to win based on current statistical indicators.
Isac Stroemberg vs Fredrik Krogh Solheim Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
I. Stroemberg vs F. K. Solheim H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 6 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:36:8 | Average Match Time | 1:36:8 |
| 63% (50/80) | 1st Serve % | 63% (37/59) |
| 64% (32/50) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (22/37) |
| 50% (15/30) | 2nd Serve Win % | 32% (7/22) |
| 56% (5/9) | Break Pts Won % | 18% (2/11) |
| 51% (30/59) | Return Points Win % | 41% (33/80) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
I. Stroemberg Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-3 5-7 10-8 | ||
QF | L | 4-6 6-1 6-3 | ||
R2 | W | 5-7 6-2 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-7(9) 6-3 6-2 | ||
Q3 | W | 7-6(4) 6-0 | ||
F. K. Solheim Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | w/o | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 6-2 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-3 6-1 | ||
Q2 | W | 6-3 6-0 | ||
R1 | L | 6-1 1-6 6-3 | ||

I. Stroemberg vs F. K. Solheim Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 44.00% (11/14) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.52% (39/30) |
| 45.00% (27/33) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.41% (87/70) |
| 47.47% (272/301) | Games Win/Loss | 53.02% (826/732) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.25% (18/14) |
| 47.37% (9/10) | Clay Win/Loss | 56.76% (21/16) |
| 40.00% (2/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 19 | Aces Total | 74 |
| 0.38 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.05 |
| 106 | Total Double Faults | 40 |
| 1:21:50 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 225.16 | Average Opponent Rank | 152.46 |
| 63% (847/1341) | 1st Serve % | 63% (851/1348) |
| 60% (511/847) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (582/851) |
| 41% (205/494) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (227/497) |
| 55% (75/137) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 37% (48/131) |
| 45% (624/1383) | Return Points Win % | 37% (505/1356) |
| 44.00% (11/14) | Futures W/L | 56.52% (39/30) |
| 44% (11/25) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (39/69) |
| 60% (3/5) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (6/12) |
| 50% (5/10) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (10/19) |
| 73% (11/8) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (37/33) |
| 27% (11/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (37/4) |
| 21% (14/3) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (32/6) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

Ella Seidel vs Hanne Vandewinkel Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
